Statistics: 04.05.2024 21:16:08 - MCR MLADEZE 2024 - MK Most - Actual/Potential / / Overall best - JES G12_24 - Heat race (180 Sec)


Pos
Driver
Comment
Qualify result
1-Red
2-Yellow
3-Green
4-White
5-Orange
6-Blue
All race
Total Laps
13
42 Panov Jakub ml
10.107 (10.193)
96.3%
89.1%
96.0%
90.8%
94.1%
91.5%
94.2%
102.45
5
3 Rubik Frantisek ml
8.495 ( 8.621)
93.9%
94.4%
90.4%
86.6%
94.8%
95.5%
94.1%
116.07
3
33 Pulpan Simon st
8.108 ( 8.218)
91.0%
93.6%
94.4%
94.5%
88.7%
90.7%
93.5%
121.05
1
5 Jager Jaroslav j
7.503 ( 7.517)
94.2%
92.0%
90.3%
96.5%
89.0%
90.4%
93.3%
131.32
6
19 Sachr Vojtěch st
8.814 ( 8.994)
91.0%
96.3%
84.5%
90.3%
94.3%
92.0%
93.2%
113.35
8
47 Jirak Pavel st
9.368 ( 9.509)
89.7%
84.9%
94.0%
89.1%
93.0%
93.8%
92.6%
107.57
15
12 Turcakova Veronika ml
9.982 (10.006)
93.7%
92.5%
88.2%
90.7%
89.9%
91.2%
92.3%
101.13
4
9 Kubinova Liliana ml
8.916 ( 8.934)
89.6%
94.0%
94.2%
84.6%
88.8%
94.6%
92.3%
117.18
12
6 Bures Vojtech st
9.010 ( 9.040)
94.5%
83.0%
89.3%
93.1%
88.5%
87.5%
91.5%
103.44
7
31 Vanecek Tadeas j
8.907 ( 9.148)
89.6%
91.1%
87.9%
93.2%
82.7%
93.2%
91.0%
110.17
11
39 Dudchuk Danilo ml
9.561 ( 9.638)
92.9%
90.1%
90.7%
86.0%
86.6%
89.1%
91.0%
104.39
19
30 Daniel Andrle ml
9.967 (10.049)
92.5%
88.8%
87.4%
85.9%
88.9%
92.4%
91.0%
99.13
29
28 Cellarik Jakub j
10.072 (13.097)
85.2%
88.1%
89.8%
92.4%
90.7%
91.6%
90.9%
96.07
30
32 Vanecek Krystof st
9.698 (10.065)
86.1%
88.3%
86.0%
75.6%
98.4%
94.2%
90.1%
95.49
33
18 Sachr Jakub j
10.869 (10.886)
89.5%
94.7%
82.9%
80.4%
89.5%
87.2%
89.7%
89.42
10
4 Votech Kudrna ml
9.041 ( 9.063)
85.1%
82.0%
88.5%
90.3%
90.4%
90.5%
89.6%
106.23
27
29 Hajek Artur Jakub j
9.968 ( 9.983)
80.6%
89.0%
87.2%
90.9%
84.9%
92.1%
89.4%
96.43
14
21 Zajdlik Jachym st
9.273 ( 9.466)
88.1%
92.3%
83.8%
83.5%
87.1%
87.4%
88.7%
101.35
9
23 Musil Tomas ml
8.507 ( 9.061)
88.5%
87.0%
84.7%
81.3%
91.2%
88.6%
88.1%
107.28
17
17 Mraz Jakub st
9.431 ( 9.868)
86.4%
93.0%
82.1%
76.4%
84.3%
90.3%
87.4%
100.11
31
34 Zeman Filip ml
10.257 (10.481)
87.1%
88.3%
76.7%
86.1%
88.1%
84.2%
87.1%
94.18
25
14 Kot Michal st
9.703 ( 9.782)
83.3%
87.5%
80.0%
80.7%
81.5%
95.4%
86.9%
97.23
2
7 Haba Jiri j
7.678 ( 7.704)
94.3%
88.5%
95.0%
73.3%
85.2%
74.2%
86.6%
122.25
23
10 Safr Filip st
8.760 ( 8.760)
87.4%
80.7%
83.9%
76.6%
86.3%
87.8%
85.4%
97.59
22
22 Votocek Adam st
9.032 ( 9.619)
85.3%
85.4%
84.9%
83.1%
76.7%
86.2%
85.4%
98.13
34
11 Duris David ml
11.069 (11.393)
93.7%
81.4%
79.6%
79.5%
78.2%
92.1%
85.4%
88.53
16
37 Straka Pavel st
8.937 ( 9.153)
81.7%
89.8%
84.1%
76.0%
86.6%
83.5%
85.2%
100.32
26
45 Fekete Pavel ml
9.755 (10.120)
75.4%
94.8%
87.4%
79.8%
80.8%
82.6%
84.7%
97.15
37
40 Richtr Jan ml
10.355 (10.922)
92.1%
86.1%
84.3%
68.3%
80.7%
85.0%
84.3%
84.54
21
43 Panov Adam ml
9.451 ( 9.738)
75.5%
86.5%
83.3%
75.2%
87.4%
86.1%
84.3%
98.16
24
41 Zak Bartolomej ml
9.390 ( 9.630)
66.4%
87.5%
84.8%
87.5%
85.6%
82.5%
84.1%
97.29
18
46 Podlena Vaclav j
8.905 ( 9.069)
93.2%
75.8%
88.8%
70.0%
89.0%
71.5%
83.2%
99.51
20
16 Viturka Cenek st
9.005 ( 9.161)
91.5%
75.3%
86.3%
78.8%
76.1%
81.8%
83.1%
98.55
36
13 Ruml Tomas ml
9.846 ( 9.927)
78.3%
85.8%
76.9%
85.3%
67.2%
87.0%
81.3%
88.18
28
24 Sucharda Jakub st
8.990 ( 9.260)
80.8%
75.2%
81.0%
87.7%
78.6%
72.8%
80.8%
96.40
32
35 Tuhacek Filip ml
9.068 ( 9.199)
82.3%
86.0%
65.4%
69.1%
79.9%
81.4%
79.1%
91.37
35
26 Benes Lukas st
9.009 ( 9.314)
25.3%
88.6%
90.1%
85.9%
84.1%
81.7%
78.7%
88.19
41
27 Hubinek Filip ml
9.807 (10.174)
72.7%
76.1%
13.61
38
25 Sucharda Jan ml
9.029 ( 9.138)
75.1%
77.1%
75.5%
79.8%
69.4%
66.9%
75.8%
83.32
40
38 Vidrsperk Samuel st
10.262 (13.500)
87.1%
62.8%
63.3%
63.0%
79.1%
76.2%
74.2%
76.07
39
8 Kavan Matej st
8.638 ( 8.800)
36.2%
85.7%
79.7%
63.6%
51.4%
93.3%
69.7%
82.36
42
2 Triska Pavel j
99.999 (99.999)
0.0%
Best ->
96.3%
96.3%
96.0%
96.5%
98.4%
95.5%

Each cell shows the Actual/Potential ratio, and indicate how stable you perform on the track.
'Actual' is the number of laps you completed during the race.
'Potential' is the number of laps you might have achieved, if you raced every lap at your fastest time on the lane.
The closer the ratio is to 100 % the closer you are to your ideal performance.

Return to Results